This makes no sense to me.
State Attorneys General have no standing with respect to elections, except for that which is delegated to them by the legislature. Unless a state legislature has specifically instructed an AG to file with SCOTUS, then I believe Mike’s big lawsuit will get bounced like all the rest.
More strategic deception? A component of a larger plan?
I don’t know.
Poso w/ a French Connection joke, haha.
Okay.... I can think of a reason State AGs would be involved:
Criminality. Specific criminality in each State that the PCAPs reveal.
In other words, he’s going to State AGs and saying “hello, your State’s elections were hacked, here’s the evidence.”
But I’m still confused, honestly, as I would think him doing such a thing would results in investigations by FBI, DHS, DoD.
Man...I cannot get it out of my head that this may be related to Durham.
To clarify, in order for the conspirators to produce the fake evidence of a Trump/Alfa Bank secret connection, they spoofed DNS lookups between a server at Spectrum Allied Health and two Alfa bank servers, all thread aimed at Trump Org's email server.
Gap between lookups at spectrum is always 61mins. Researchers for more capable than I have been looking at this and I have been studying their work trying to understand.
What I'm wondering is if this effort by Lindell, like the post election lawsuits and hearings, is just as much or more about educating the public and the legislatures as it is anything else.
Lindell wouldn't even need to "be in the know" here. Better that he isn't and that he is earnest in his efforts.
I can't draw the connection perfectly, but knowing what I learned about PCAPs this Summer, the spoofed DNS lookups, and the spying done on Trump... it seems worth considering.
Been kicking this around in my head since Friday, I think it was.
Here are the threads I have been looking at to learn about this:
And this thread as well- https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1438609647066300418.html
There's a lot to this that is very technical and I can't pretend to understand it all.
But we KNOW that Mark Elias, Perkins Coie, and the DNC were involved in this scandal, spygate etc.
And we also know they "fortified" the election.
Not too far out to speculate they used some of the same methods to do both.
Did THEY use PCAPs to spy, spoof, and alter election systems?
That's what I am getting at with this theory.
Apologies for not being able to lay it out succinctly, yet. : )
It's all a bit nebulous to me, but I am working on it.
I'm just nitpicking the term's definition here. PCAPs are recordings of data traffic.
You might be thinking about a man in the middle attack, between originating and destination address to alter the data.
But that's part of what Mike's contention was - the machines were connected to the internet when they weren't supposed to.
Yeah, he said he was researching it. I understood him to mean that he would possibly be putting in as Part of the Devo series.
I was just looking at this. I bet he has, too.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!