Show older

1/2) Well, this is awkward. A Danish study combined ALL the RCT data on vaccines and found the mRNA vaccines did nothing to lower death. During a pandemic. Zippo (at best).
OTOH AZ and J&J performed very well. Why were the mRNA pushed so hard, then?

youtu.be/Q3koKVb8SEk

twitter.com/chrismartenson/sta

2/2) Why didn't the CDC make these findings very well known? Why did the FDA allow such shoddy vaccine trial designs to go forward that could answer neither transmission nor mortality questions? During a pandemic...
This is a very bad look for the regulators. Very bad. twitter.com/chrismartenson/sta





Sobering news comes with genetic products that have no long-term safety assurances. Need good epidemiology on documented natural infection, mandated product administration, both, and none in order to evaluate associations. Very few in last category to serve as control group. twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/sta



So Pfizer was giving people a false sense of protection with their (never stated) 12% efficacy rate for the first 7 days and then less than 1% after that. And doctors were swearing by it. And companies mandating it. They should ALL be held accountable.
No wonder they want continuous boosters. They know their jabs don’t work.
twitter.com/beyouonlybetter/st





Remember, “The vaccine is safe for pregnant women”-let me introduce the paperwork dumped by Pfizer, 50k pages. Now we know why they wanted to keep this hidden for 50+years.
@CDCgov, any comments? I know it's rare, and the benefits outweigh the risk, right?!
twitter.com/Frank_Cap1_BOE/sta





A side benefit of the use of masks is reduction in dose of the virus exposed t.co/WxT0LMpQ3J
This was initially pointed out by @kprather88 and colleagues in a classic @ScienceMagazine perspective early in the pandemic
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi
twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1

2) “Cloth masks do little to prevent the spread of COVID-19, or other airborne diseases, a new study finds. Researchers from the University of Bristol in the [UK] found that 90 percent of particles could get through cloth masks, making them effectively useless during the pandemic.”
Filtration rates of masks according to the journal 'Physics of Fluid.' Sorry, cloths and surgical masks are worthless. twitter.com/kylenabecker/statu

1) Thread: 45+ Mask Studies

The medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.

Peer reviewed study showing masks injure every bodily organ that research team studied:
pdmj.org/papers/masks_false_sa
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat

6) Ritter et al., in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/115741
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



7) Application of human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.” europepmc.org/article/med/7379
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



8) Laslett &Sabin, in 1989, found that caps & masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ab
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



9) 1991 study, a gen surgery team wore 0 masks in half of their surgeries for 2 years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, after 1,551 operations performed with 0 masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%. link.springer.com/article/10.1
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



10) A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.”
t.co/l7ebf9aYHF
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



11) Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”
europepmc.org/article/med/1176
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



12) Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries.
Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ab
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



13) Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden. pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/



14) Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.” semanticscholar.org/paper/Does
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



15) Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.
advancesinpd.com/adv01/21Figue
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



17) Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Part 1 - Face masks, eye protection and person distancing: systematic review and meta-analysis twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



19) Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



21) Comparison of Filtration Efficiency and Pressure Drop in Anti-Yellow Sand
Masks, Quarantine Masks, Medical Masks, General Masks, and Handkerchiefs
t.co/dpSMr2hCbB
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



22) Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/192160
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



23) Comparison of Filtration Efficiency and Pressure Drop in Anti-Yellow Sand
Masks, Quarantine Masks, Medical Masks, General Masks, and Handkerchiefs
t.co/dpSMr2hCbB
twitter.com/FineTunedFoto/stat



This is one of my favorite smoking guns that the Covid mask crusade was made-up BS.

OSHA admits that surgical masks are *NOT* designed to protect against airborne pathogens.

Show this to all of your scientifically illiterate friends.

PDF file t.co/Y0MNSVTg38

twitter.com/kylenabecker/statu



Follow

Sure looking like the CDC and FDA suspended all rules and buried all negative data on behalf of Pfizer.
Now you know why they wanted 75 yrs to release the data. twitter.com/johncardillo/statu



Biden’s first senior advisor for his Covid task force still suggests to mask between bites of food. This administration’s handling of Covid has truly been an abomination. twitter.com/TheEliKlein/status



All of these things Bill Gates insisted they did not know … those of us who were, you know, paying attention knew from the very beginning, particularly from the Diamond Princess outbreak in very early February 2020. twitter.com/SKMorefield/status



🧵 by Clay Travis
May 5, 2022

1) Just to make it clear where we are: our government mandated 100% healthy people get covid shots provided by for profit companies or lose their jobs & is now telling us that one of the shots they told us to take isn’t safe & has life threatening side effects.
Our govt also told us two covid shots would keep us from getting or spreading covid, sought to ban anyone who suggested otherwise, before later admitting it neither kept you from getting or spreading covid.

2) Our government also told us it wasn’t safe for our kids to go to school in person — even though kids have a statistically 0% risk from covid — & that we all had to wear masks, including two year olds, even though there is no data to support masks making any of us safer.
This fall the government will tell you a 5th covid shot will solve all of it. And if you question any of this at all you’re labeled a conspiracy theorist who needs to be investigated by their allies in mainstream media,

Oh. NJ Fam Practice Student Athlete Policy: “If you have received doses of any Covid vaccine, we will not be able to clear you to compete in sports without performing lab work & possibly an echocardiogram to rule out potential heart damage” morrissussexfamilypractice.com
twitter.com/andrewbostom/statu

I never jumped on the bandwagon one way or the other, & as far as we can discern at the moment, most ppl who've gotten the jabs have done OK.
But ill effects rate has been unusually high, & nature of effects alarming.
Need to revisit whole idea of vax for a coronavirus. Why vax?
twitter.com/OptimisticCon/stat



At the end of the day, they won't be able to hide the bodies. Life insurance companies are starting to pay attention. I've been speaking with several insurance executives and regulators. The truth will out. twitter.com/akheriaty/status/1



BREAKING: A massive study covering 35 European countries (602 million people) concluded that wearing COVID masks did not reduce transmission or deaths and may have exasperated the virus.
thecountersignal.com/study-mak




With the Pfizer issues now clearly surfacing, the vaccination compliance graph makes even more sense.

High Trust / Low Knowledge, jabbed.
Low Trust / High Knowledge, not jabbed.
twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/sta


Simple risk/reward calculation.
Death rate was known for covid.
99.8% survived.
Vax was untested long term.
Problems and side effects being reported.
I had a known risk that I was most likely to survive and an unknown risk which I could never qualify.
So no vax.
twitter.com/unseen1_unseen/sta
twitter.com/littleapostate/sta


Show newer

@watson I hope the data quality is as high as what they have put out so far.

@watson

So is wrong on so many levels, teens easily succumb to peer pressure!

@Bleukitty @watson Any parent that still lives in CA and turns over their kids to Govt schools, approves of this.

@Phil

It is easier to say that, if you have the means to leave.

@watson

@Bleukitty @watson no, I understand that some people are stuck, but they do not have to put their kids in Govt schools. Besides no price is too high to pay when it comes to protecting one's kids. many of the people that stay could leave at great sacrifice but they are not willing to pay it. Many others could find a way to send their kids out (to relatives, etc) the Brits in London did this in WWII to protect their kids. The problem is people don't really see the danger.

@Phil

I cannot argue, your points are valid. I would not let this happen to mine! If this passes, what is next? Sexual assignment surgery without parental consent...this slippery slope is steep!

@watson

@Bleukitty @watson even if it doesn't get to the surgery, but they have already groomed a kid to the point where he or she wants the surgery, the damage is pretty severe. a 7 or 8 year old kid is extremely vulnerable to emotional and mental manipulation. They have made clear their intention to take advantage of that fact and fill their minds and hearts with evil. A parent that allows this, short of walking out of the state or being held at gun point, is worthy of scorn.

@watson
Is it the line where, if you cross it, you get away with mass murder scot free?
Show newer

@watson With infertility out of control and abortions, the left will become extinct.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Free Atlantis - Free Speech - Intelligent Conversation - Good People - Good Fun

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!