Recent searches
Search options
watson 
"The NIH decided the risk was worth it. In a potentially fateful decision, it funded work similar to Baric’s at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which soon used its own reverse-genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras. Unnoticed by most, however, was a key difference that significantly shifted the risk calculation. The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+."
2005
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1149438/
2006
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124135/
2008
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19036930/
2009
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19153232/
2010
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19906932/
2013
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23365422/
That's why Senator @ RandPaul accused dr. fauci of funding “supervirus” research in the US and “making a huge mistake” by trading the know-how to China.
Fauci denied the accusation, stating categorically: “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1636153098313031680
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1636151526623432704/pu/vid/480x270/W1FfIEGhjSo6p6AP.mp4
But even Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, told congress last week that he believes dr. anthony fauci used American taxpayer dollars to fund the bioweapons research that created COVID-19:
"I think it did — not only from NIH but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD."
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1636154129059053571
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1636153459111243777/pu/vid/480x270/TLO28TjRZDjsp8ex.mp4
And that's why @ RobertKennedyJr told @ jimmy_dore that dr. anthony fauci has been the 'American Czar of Bioweapons' since 2002.
BULLETIN FROM DR. ANTHONY FAUCI!
EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE IS NATURAL. BY DEFINITION! THEREFORE THE CORONAVIRUS IS NATURAL TOO. EVEN IF XI JINPING COOKED IT UP WITH A USED DOUCHE, IT'S NATURAL.
SUCK ON THAT, RAND PAUL.
BULLETIN FROM DR. ANTHONY FAUCI!
fauci vs fauci: a compilation of lies and contradictions on Gain of Function, Lab Leak Theory, Masks, Lockdowns, Vaccine Side Effects and Masks.
https://twitter.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1636106320486047744
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1636106124700024834/vid/490x270/sZVupiHZuBlZfGSw.mp4
Dr. Fauci responds to criticism that he funded the gain-of-function research that created COVID-19:
"If you look at the viruses that the Chinese were working on with money supplied from NIH, anybody who knows even a little bit about virology will tell you that it would be molecularly impossible..."
see the 2'43" video clip at:
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1636189187442622465
Kentucky Sen. @ RandPaul:
#Fauci may be still working for the government because "he is worried about being indicted."
"There's a lot of stuff going on, but at the top of every concern we have, it's Tony Fauci."
From a new #NIH FOIA release I received today. An email exchange between NIH's Michael Lauer and Lawrence Tabak on April 22, 2020, etc.
Full set of documents here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23737251-tobias-v-hhs-21-cv-02805-33123-partial-production_redacted
From the new FOIA release by @ JamesCTobias. State Department approval for #NIH grant by @ EcoHealthNYC
Humanized mice 5-6 Novel SARS-related coronaviruses "All work involving samples and viral isolates from bats
will be performed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology"
Seems pretty big!
In July of 2020, the #nih suspended a grant from @ EcoHealthNYC until they Explain the disappearance of Huang Yanling(!) Explain the diminished cell phone traffic and roadblocks around the WIV
"EcoHealth Alliance must arrangefor WIV to submit to an outside inspection team charged to review the lab facilities and lab records, with specific attention to addressing the questionof whether WIV staff had SARS-CoV-2 in their possession prior to December 2019."
(Oct 2020)
"The fact that EcoHealth
does not currently
have a subrecipient
relationship
with WIV and had
not issued subawards
to WIV at the timeof suspension
does not absolve EcoHealth
of any past
non-compliance
with the terms and conditions."
Is nih trying to shift the blame onto EcoHealthNYC by letting us see all the nastygrams they sent?
"In addition to objecting to NIH's authority to seck the materials, information, and a site visit, EcoHealth has responded that it lacks knowledge or information regarding the requests; that it is not in possession, custody,or controlofthe specified items; and that it has no authority to grant NIAID and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences access to WIV's facility to conduct an inspection..."
"EcoHealth’s responses have not satisfied NIH's concerns that EcoHealth had failed to adequately monitor the compliance of its subrececipicnt, and that the subrecipicnt, WIV, had failed to comply with safety requirements."
NIH in April 2020 (ie after PO)
"One of the major components of the grant, namely, the Wuhan Institute of Virology(WIV), is being considered for suspension bc of concerns that the current crisis was precipitated by the release from WIV of the virus responsible for COVID-19"
So Dr. Fauci was not simply speculating about the presence of humanized mice at the WIV? Had he saw that Peter Daszak was asking for a grant extension in 2019 to test novel SARS-related coronaviruses in them?
In October 2021, a progress report was submitted (2 years late) that showed they were using humanized mice.
Everything is coming out in drips.
First the EcoHealth report (2 years late) is filed in 2021, showing experiments with humanized mice.
The "Wild West" emails were redacted until recently
And only yesterday, we find out that the State department and (Fauci?) knew the whole time
US tax dollars to pay for research into bat coronaviruses - 3 years after Trump 'terminated' grant https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12061241/Research-group-linked-Covid-lab-leak-fears-receive-2m-taxpayer-cash.html
#AnthonyFauci's top advisor at the National Institutes of Health told his colleagues to use his personal Gmail when discussing the origins of the Covid virus to avoid FOIA requests. He also told his colleagues that he deleted the emails to avoid legal discovery.
https://theintercept.com/2023/06/29/covid-nih-personal-email-foia/
#Fauci Flashback: “My records are an open book” —a claim #Fauci made after #NIH redacted nearly 99% of a FOIA request made by the Intercept
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1553509293474955266/pu/vid/478x270/5rl6CswUrrqqzxcH.mp4
https://twitter.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1679863879721951233
In February 2020, #AnthonyFauci privately told scientists that COVID-19 could have been created at the Wuhan lab because "scientists in Wuhan University" were "working on gain-of-function experiments to determine the molecular mechanisms associated with bat viruses adapting to human infection, and the outbreak originated in Wuhan."
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1679619948518453249
Well, well…what have we here? The #NIH testing the effects of adrenochrome on humans. So it’s not a “conspiracy”. My question: where did the NIH get this adrenochrome they harvested, acc to their study? Effects of adrenochrome & epinephrine on human…
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7582857/
https://archive.ph/yEnv6
https://twitter.com/laralogan/status/1681848164855234563
Baric.
Ralph Baric.
He is the key to understanding the origin of C19.
But he is inaccessible.
Stayed under the radar for over 3 years.
How is that possible?
Obviously he is protected by some powerful forces.
https://twitter.com/tony_vandongen/status/1681845987533307905
1/ Leaked messages from the authors of the 2020 "Proximal Origin" paper, which denied COVID-19's lab origin, expose scientific fraud and misconduct as they express disbelief in their paper's own conclusions.
dr #AnthonyFauci, an advocate of gain-of-function research, secretly commissioned the paper and later cited it at the White House podium to dismiss the lab leak theory as a "conspiracy theory."
2/ The paper, which resulted in social media companies banning accounts and censoring discussions on the lab leak, concluded, “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.”
The author's private messages expose a different story.
3/ Dr. Kristian Andersen:
"The lab escape version of this is so friggin likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work & the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario."
"The main issue is that accidental escape is in fact highly likely-it's not some fringe theory."
4/ Dr. Andrew Rambaut:
"Given the shit show that would happen if anyone serious accused the Chinese of even accidental release... We cannot possibly distinguish between natural evolution and escape so we are content with ascribing it to natural processes."
"Lab passaging might also generate this mutation."
5/ Dr. Ian Lipkin
"I am concerned that scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not take adequate precautions when growing bat viruses."
"[There is still] the possibility of inadvertent release following adaptation through selection in culture at the Institute in Wuhan."
6/ Dr. Edward Holmes:
"No way selection could occur in the market. Too low a density of mammals: really just small groups of 3-4 in cases."
"Ian Lipkin just called - very worried about the furin cleavage site and says that high ups are too, inc intel."
7/ Dr. Robert Garry
"Transmitting a bat virus-like RatG13 in HeLa cells and then asking your graduate student to insert a furin site... would get you there. It's not crackpot to suggest this could have happened given the Gain of Function research we know is happening."
8/ "I'm thinking mostly about the PRRA to generate the furin site. Relatively easy to drop 12 bases in. The proline is the hang-up - why add that? Makes me think the cell culture passage scenario [in a laboratory] is possible/probably assuming this has in fact been observed before by Farzan and Fouchier."
9/ Due to the authors' private statements contradicting their scientific conclusions, which led to global censorship of the lab leak possibility, Nature Medicine should retract the "Proximal Origin" paper.
If COVID-19 potentially resulted from gain-of-function research, why does the United States continue to fund such research domestically and internationally?
(Graphic created by @ RAEMKA1)
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1682835284893859841
Covid origins discourse currently dominated by opinions about people who have opinions about people who have opinions about Covid origins. Twitter really helps to get to the meat of the issue
https://twitter.com/PaulBieniasz/status/1682891405008535554
Not really. Covid origin discourse is currently dominated by the fact that the editor-in-chief of one of the world's most prestigious science journals aggressively propagandized the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper, only to now claim that the paper was just some guys' opinion.
https://twitter.com/HansMahncke/status/1682913661352812545
New Investigation Shows the #NIH & Pfizer are Bankrolling ‘Gender Affirming Care’ Research & Propaganda
“It gets a lot more interesting when you look at who backs the group…One that we found particularly interesting was Pfizer…When you look into the products that Pfizer makes, we identified at least five different drugs that are used in these sex change attempts.”
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1684671693673938944/vid/480x270/15xvEzgTHepKtjBH.mp4
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1684671839073644544
Physicians gather at the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100,000 petition signatures to call for an investigation into #Fauci's misdealings & corruption.
"Never before have we seen such a blatantly corrupt government official not be prosecuted."
https://twitter.com/drsimonegold/status/1684607497212919830
@watson It's not going away, and neither is the rest of its corruption. We have turned a page.